Tel Aviv’s breakthrough in the withdrawal from southern Lebanon; Reload of Zionists’ resistance and computing system
In the meantime, there is no positive news from political channels. Joseph Aoun and Nawaf Salam, who were committed to the full implementation of the ceasefire and the Security Council resolution, provided the opportunity to dismiss the occupiers, but in a passive way, they were demanding a cease -fire extension until February 18th.
Under such circumstances, the key question for Lebanese public opinion and experts is how long the Zionist army intends to stay in southern Lebanon? Is the Zionist Prime Minister plans to move towards the exacerbation of tensions in other fronts, especially the West Bank and Lebanon? Is it possible for Tel Aviv to move towards the resumption of war in Lebanon after political changes in the White House and Damascus? What is the role of mediators?
Refreshment of Zionist resistance and computing system
After the Lebanon’s two-month ceasefire was launched from late November, the Hebrew media and thoughts in the West tried to “negatively” of political-defense situation Hezbollah shows that they will provide the basis for changing the political situation in Beirut. Despite all the Western and Zionist propaganda games, the results of the morning of the Lebanese parliament to elect the president showed that the resistance faction still has high power to appoint the president in Lebanon.
Hezbollah’s superior defense military power
in the military field, according to many people close to Hezbollah, this group still considers a significant portion of its defense capability because Has not used against the occupying forces. Therefore, if the Lebanese-Syrian communications current will create this misconception among the Zionists that there is a good time to weaken Hezbollah and change political conditions in Lebanon; Zionist defensive systems and shelters must be ready for storms of missiles that have not been used during the recent war. The risk of accepting the start of a war with Hezbollah could end at the expense of the Riyadh normalization project and the absence of residents of the occupied territories by the end of this year.
cease-fire observers; Partner of thief and comrade
Before setting up a ceasefire on the Northern Front, Amos Hoccocchtein in coordination with Paris, Doha and Cairo talks about the establishment of a permanent ceasefire in Lebanon with international actors guarantees. At that time, some of the resistance lovers believed that the Biden government is the benefit of Israel’s interests, and Washington seems unlikely to pay the slightest importance to Lebanon’s interests or resistance.
during the recent Zionist regime’s violation of the withdrawal from southern Lebanon, the American side, rather than intensifying pressure on Tel Aviv for violating the ceasefire. , The ceasefire extension until February 18th! The French, who have long been a supporter and friend of the Lebanese nation-nation, have only been releasing a statement and did not take any effective action to fully and fully execute the ceasefire.
Violation of the Zionist regime’s covenant and the passive reaction of mediators once again confirmed the idea that the only actor committed to Lebanese interests and security, Hezbollah and groups of groups With this flow. During the last three decades, if it had not been for the resistance, Lebanon would have had a similar fate to today’s Syria, becoming a Zionist army and terrorist groups. These are the resistance forces that defend the constitution, territorial integrity, civil rights and even the freedom of Lebanese citizens at various levels and do not allow foreign actors to dominate the affairs of the Arab country.
recent developments have been very decisive and show how much Lebanese people have to trust people like Michel Aoun or Nawaf Salam to secure their interests. In other words, the continuation of the presence of Zionist occupiers in southern Lebanon will confirm the thought and will of survival in the Lebanese border with occupied Palestine.
Talk interest
Special geopolitical conditions in southern Lebanon, weapons of resistance, anti-Zionist ideology of local residents, and southern Lebanese population, make the Zionist regime’s army not possible in Lebanon. The weakening or destruction of each of the above variables means the heavy financial-human cost of the Zionist economy and armed forces. At the same time, Netanyahu’s cabinet is trying to achieve a significant achievement by changing the order of the Zionist community by changing the order of the Zionist community.
In this dual politicians, military commanders and Zionist security officials must make difficult choices that do not necessarily have a clear perspective. The key point is that each of these two options has the benefits and damages that can affect the Zionist regime’s regional position in the long run.
