There is no guarantee of Washington’s adherence to bilateral agreements; “Enemy of treaties” is not reliable
“Mehr News Agency correspondent Verde Saad has interviewed Yahya Harb, an international affairs expert who reads the full text:
The main factors that have made many countries doubt about US credit in international negotiations, to to What do you know in the shadow of the country’s repeated departure from important agreements such as the Paris agreement or the Brajam Treaty?
“The Enemy of Treaties” is a name that can be elected for him in the first term of President Donald Trump between years 1 and 2.
Donald Trump had a set of measures to exit the international and bilateral treaties that began in June of this year and withdrew from the Paris climate agreement. In October of that year, the United States also excluded from UNESCO UNESCO.
May 5, US President Donald Trump, decided to unilaterally remove the nuclear deal with Iran, while the Agency International Atomic Energy had emphasized that Iran adhered to the clauses of this agreement.
Trump announced in June 2008 US withdrawal from the United Nations Human Rights Council and on October 3 of that year from the voluntary protocol to resolve the Vienna Treaty Conflict Conflict. Out.
Even a special postal agreement, signed about 5 years ago, did not spare against Trump’s misconduct. Another Trump move in this area was the attack against the Mediterranean Nuclear Treaty, which he left in February of this year, and in April of that year, the United States excluded from the United Nations Arms Treaty that created restrictions on the sale of weapons to war criminals. .
Trump’s latest actions in the first presidential term, which was also one of his most controversial decisions, was the exit of the World Health Organization, which took place in July of this year.
Trump has also made a set of decisions since returning to the White House on January 7th that led the US out of several international organizations and the main financial support program of this Has stopped the country. These include the removal of the World Health Organization and the Human Rights Council and the International Development Agency and the International Development Agency.
these actions have eliminated world order and questioned the credibility of international institutions and what has angered American friends more than enemies is that Trump takes these actions without respect for his allies or consider historical relationships with them.
This is what has led the whole world to look at American chaos and racist policies.
US withdrawal from some international organizations such as the World Health Organization or some treaties including mid-range missile treaties How can it be justified? How will these actions affect the trust of the international community as one of the parties to negotiation?
Trump’s most important decisions about exit from international institutions and organizations are made according to various motivations:
1. Economics : The United States claims that it costs a lot to finance these institutions and other parties to the international community benefit from it. The country has called for an increase in the share of other countries’ participation in these organizations.
۱. Politics: The charges against some of these institutions, such as anti -Israeli or anti -Israeli activity, are among the most important motivations. In this regard, organizations such as UNESCO and Anva and the boycott imposed on the International Court of Hague can be mentioned.
1- Charging or the low impact of these institutions such as the World Trade Organization, which the US has threatened to exit, has not yet taken action. /p>
Zionist bias is one of the most important incentives in the United States that has angered public opinion, US action to accuse some UN-affiliated organizations on The organization has created the occupation regime of Quds and has completely subjected it to the United States and the West. The strange thing is that the United States believes that international organizations must not only support the regime, but also encourage its crimes and rape.
The US has replaced its interests with the interests of the international community for decades, but now it does so even without taking the usual international protocols, even without taking into account the usual international protocols. That has not even preserved the reputation of its allies who are always with it.
Do you believe that US frequent exit from international foreign policy changes in the country’s isolation path Will it create more or is it the only tactic for the negotiations? How can other governments interact with this method?
The main feature of US policymaking is the tendency of unilateral hegemony over the world and abusing international law in the service of its competitors and enemies in the world. Talking about isolation or national extremist tendencies in the United States is only a slogan to incite domestic public opinion and lead them to the ruling camp for fear of civil and international wars. The United States, of course, cannot consider itself to be a separate woven from the world, as its government is essentially a set of companies that have looted and stole the financial resources of various nations and have depended their economy in favor of their swollen economy. So isolation in this case means the death and death of America.
There is no doubt that the world would be much better without America, and this Zionist imperialism is the cause of more than 5 % of the world’s problems and wars and crises. Naturally, Donald Trump’s “self -esteem” and his accompanying team have emerged on various factors and have made the actions that are irrational and adventure to be defensible and justified. Of course, the point that makes Trump more adventures is the power of the other parties to stand up to him and challenge his criminal approach, but silence and retreat against this dangerous tsunami increased the power and superiority of America and Trump. Becomes.
In the shadow of the US withdrawal from some international agreements, what is the country to negotiate that in the negotiations in The future will do with other countries, especially on some important and sensitive issues such as nuclear disarmament or climate change?
I think there is no strong guarantee of Washington’s adherence to bilateral or international agreements, because it is not only related to Trump and his extremist rightist team, Rather, it has become a public policy with the US government.
, for example, the former US President Joe Biden failed to return to Iran’s nuclear deal, while promising to do so in his election campaign. It was one of his most important election programs that could reflect the US respect for international charters and agreements. Over the past two years, Biden’s behavior in humiliating and closing international institutions has been worse than Trump.
America is actually the largest rebellious state in the world whose material power and domination over the international community have left it without trial.
Given this amount of doubt in US credibility, especially in the Trump administration, the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, insisted that negotiations with America is neither clever nor honorable nor wise, and negotiating with the US will never solve Iran’s problems.
This view is expanding in Europe and the countries of the Arab region, as many American Arab governments see that Washington has abandoned all its obligations to the Palestinian issue. And he converges with the Zionist positions; Even if these policies are in violation of the security and interests of governments that consider themselves the United States in the region.
