Governments to overcome the crisis of public necessity during the war
reports The emergence of successive crises in the military, social, security and particular economic areas peaked. Massoud Nili, one of the officials of the country’s Planning Organization, described the economic situation of the war during the years that oil prices had declined in those years, with the country’s total foreign exchange earnings dating to $ 7 billion in year.
, however, many experts from Ayatollah Khamenei’s government were able to manage many of the needs of the people and the economic space to a great extent, while today, unlike today’s conditions, the country was involved in a very costly and economical war. The evidence of this claim is that, unlike Iraq, which had $ 5 billion in the war with Iran, Iran ended the war with the least foreign aid.
Iran’s economic situation at the beginning of the war was not very good because in the years following the victory of the revolution and before the war, our country’s oil exports declined, and export revenues declined and even the job was negative. But the active presence of state ministries in managing the needs of the people and the current economy of the country has made the government not only faced serious problems and to meet some of the basic needs of the people by implementing support packages; It even turns to the implementation of some development policies.
Importantly, the implementation of support policies has not stopped and continued, even when we saw the relative disruption of the country’s oil exports, and continued. One of the government’s measures to meet the needs of the people at that time was to implement a commodity oil supply plan, which helped to further export oil and make people difficult to access basic commodities, but the current government benefits much more benefits because the country has at least a need for commodities. Has.
The oil market was involved in a price shock in year 6, so the government moved towards the development of non-oil exports, which led to the first time in the years following the revolution, we saw a significant increase in non-oil exports, and at that time, Iran’s non-oil exports, and non-oil exports. But the import of our country covered a wide range of products, which is why the government has assigned a number of cabinet members to prepare a crisis and non -oil export program so that it could provide new foreign exchange resources and manage its currency use more. As a result of the implementation of this non -oil export, our country increased by 5 % to 5 % in the year, and the government successfully crossed the crisis.
One of the main reasons for the success of the government in providing people’s basic commodities during the war was that it was active in determining the details, type and amount of goods imported into the country without restriction. Because the government sought to reach maximum prosperity among the people by spending minimal foreign exchange resources.
The point to note is that in critical situations, the import of goods is only adverse when we see unnecessary, luxurious and unnecessary imports of consumer goods, otherwise the import of basic goods is not negatively negative; Rather, it is also essential for the welfare and needs of the people.
One of the biggest mistakes in the crisis of crisis, which has not been low in recent years, is that to normalize conditions, the door of imports of unnecessary and luxurious goods will be exposed to the importance of importing the amount of imports in the event of a critical. To be.
Another policy that helped the war governments to meet both the military needs of the war and the need for basic commodities was that policies were changed rapidly and, according to time.
In fact, the most important government policy, which incidentally contributed to the success of the country during the transition from the war, was the policy of limiting and importing because it maintained and developed domestic production and development. It was based on this approach that in the final years of the war, and especially in year 2, the volume of imports was greatly reduced.
Among other important measures in the war governments were the fair distribution and distribution of basic commodities based on the need Fredfred community that provided the conditions for all people to access the needs of the Currency Currency. High in the management of currency consumption.
Another government action to manage the country’s economic flow during the war was also a decline in the number of banks in the country. On the other hand, determining the facility ceiling for the banking system and the effort to directly inhibit the allocation of credits led to the control of the volume of money based on domestic production and the need for the country’s economy.
, of course, the intensification of the activity of commodity or prostitution networks, especially in the late years of the war, was one of the problems of the government at that time, but in recent years we have seen a similar process of exploiting government currency rent against people. Of course, one of the important approaches of the war government in response to such measures to turn into contradictory policies and to apply harsh dealings with offenders in this area was somewhat efficient.
Implementation of quota policy in the distribution of basic commodities along with the government’s supervision and effort to control prices. But there were also problems, including the smuggling of goods out and the expansion of hoarding networks, which made people forced to provide more surplus demand from the free market. Of course, in order to solve this problem, Imam Khomeini (R) allowed the government to be treated seriously and the use of government ta’zir in dealing with such crimes.
According to what was said, war governments have increased their presence and interference in supplying and distributing these commodities in the process of trying to meet people’s needs and prevent crisis and prevent rising commodity prices, so that the plan to distribute and raise the commodities in a fair year. In this project, commodities such as rice, poultry, meat and even sugar were provided to the public on a minimal quota through retailers and distribution companies.
It seems that in the current situation the government has to accept in economic warfare and to overcome economic warfare problems and to implement similar supportive policies. That the government wants to refrain from implementing the policies needed to provide the public necessity of public necessity is only intensifying the raising the price of commodities for the public and, on the other hand. It should not be forgotten that denying this situation or deleting the case Country in the economic war will never lead to current challenges.
Author Sajjad Zamani
