Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency; Nuclear cooperation and political challenges
Iran has again emphasized that Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency are able to solve the remaining issues regarding their peaceful nuclear program and can prevent any tension that Western countries, especially the United States, are seeking.
In this regard, Kazem Gharibabadi, Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister for Legal and International Affairs on the X-Social Network, emphasized that Iran is ready to talk to the International Atomic Energy Agency to resolve the remaining issues. Gharib Abadi’s remarks after an important meeting with the Director General of the Agency, Rafael Grossi, were discussed, where they deal with various aspects of current cooperation between Tehran and the Agency, as well as the unsolved nuclear issues that Iran is trying to resolve within its international commitments. But these statements are not limited to technical aspects; Rather, it implicitly refers to the political challenges that lead to the “politicization” of Iran’s nuclear case and disrupt the process of dialogue.
Nuclear collaboration: Long date with the Agency
Iran has sought to maintain its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency since its nuclear program for peaceful purposes (NPT) for peaceful purposes in accordance with the Nuclear Energy Development Treaty (NPT), an international institution responsible for monitoring nuclear activities and ensuring its peace. This long -term cooperation has led Iran to build mutual confidence with the agency, even despite Western countries’ efforts to “politicize” the cooperation that Gharib Abadi has mentioned in its recent statements. However, despite this continuous cooperation, some of the remaining issues between the two parties need to be resolved, which has made questions about the possibility of achieving a comprehensive solution.
Nuclear Installation Security: Priority that cannot be ignored
One of the critical points that Gharib Abadi pointed out is the issue of “security of nuclear facilities”. While the International Atomic Energy Agency is trying to solve the remaining issues with Iran, ensuring the security of Iran’s nuclear facilities is one of the fundamental issues that affect the cooperation of the two parties. Iran does not consider nuclear security to be a supplementary element, but it considers it a strategic priority. In this regard, Gharibabadi emphasized that Iran is committed to securing all of its nuclear facilities, which is part of the country’s international obligations. But this becomes more complicated when there are constant threats, especially by the Zionist regime and the United States.
American threats: Charges that have no place in diplomacy
US statements, especially from the current government, who still holds Iran’s revenge attacks by Ansarullah in Yemen, is one of the factors that weakens the possibility of any serious dialogue between Tehran and Washington. These statements are a reflection of foreign policy aimed at pressure on Iran in various fields, including the nuclear case.
Yemen, which has been involved in war for many years due to Saudi-led coalition attacks, has become a sensitive point in Iran-US relations. The Yemeni war is not only an internal conflict, it is part of a proxy war in which regional and international countries are involved, and Iran is one of the main parties accused of supporting Ansarullah (Houthis). However, Yemen’s response to the US -backed Saudi coalition attacks is not Iran’s strategic decision, but part of the Yemenis’ right to defend themselves. The attacks that Ansarullah had carried out before the fragile ceasefire, whether through missiles and drones against the Saudi coalition facilities and attacking large Saudi cities and US ships in the Red Sea, were reactions to continuous aggression.
Instead of focusing on ending attacks on Gaza and the siege of its innocent people, the United States is responsible for the attacks of Yemeni forces, which Tehran considers to be unfair. Iran emphasizes that these attacks are the result of a continuous aggression against Yemen and that Iran’s culprit is part of a political campaign aimed at restricting Iran’s movements in the region and is somehow pressure to bring it to US negotiations.
Iran and Interview: Clear and conditional position
Iran has taken a clear stance on dialogue under these circumstances. The country is ready to participate in technical talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency to solve the remaining problems, but provided that these negotiations are pure political pressure. Iran also has a basic condition for the conversation that is the halt of US threats against the country, including media attacks and statements that hold Iran responsible for attacks in Yemen.
Iran understands that any nuclear deal with the US and its allies is not possible. Therefore, Tehran requires that these talks should be held in an environment of mutual respect and without political tensions.
Can a conversation be realized in these conditions?
Undoubtedly, it is not possible to achieve a real settlement in Iran’s nuclear case in the context of continuing political pressure from the United States and its allies against Tehran. Iran is ready for dialogue, but this dialogue should be within the framework of mutual respect and avoid threats and accusations that do not help build trust between the parties. The nuclear deal with the Agency is not just a political document, but a real opportunity to improve Iran -Western relations and secure and stability in the region. But this will only happen if the political barriers are abandoned and the campaigns aimed to undermine Iran’s position are stopped.
And if there is a real will to achieve a peaceful agreement in the nuclear case, it must be the basis of independent and impartial technical cooperation, without external pressures. But what is not yet clear is whether the West is ready to respond to Iran’s demands or will it continue to impose political pressure that disrupts any real progress in the field.
