Muscat, Trump Test and Iran’s Excellence

International Group Ali ” Iraqi has sent a dedicated note entitled “Muscat, Trump Test and Iran’s Excellence” to the International Group Mehr News Agency whose full text follows:

Despite the crises and interference of the interests of the great powers, and the widespread consequences of post-storm events, Iran is a country that is not seeking crisis but a region that has its own confidence and authority. Despite maximum sanctions and pressure, Iran has been able to consolidate a equation based on national sovereignty and human dignity, while insisting on achieving technological and scientific progress, especially in the field of peaceful nuclear energy. In the same context, the new round of negotiations in the Oman reign was not just a simple negotiation station but a fundamental turning point.

What is going on in Muscat is not merely continuing the nuclear case negotiations, but a real test for US President Donald Trump’s seriousness; Someone who, after his unilateral withdrawal from the Year 2 Agreement – an agreement with the UN Security Council’s rare endorsement – is now trying to return to the negotiating table from the “power” gate. The question is, is Trump seeking to reproduce the same agreement with his circumstances or is it trying to make a dramatic transaction aimed at establishing some kind of regional stability?

Oman, as usual, hosted these negotiations with a spirit of neutrality and mediation; On the basis of the belief that sustainable solutions go through the course of dialogue, not threats. And here the fundamental difference between the two approaches is revealed: the one -hand and the drone, the other, the help of a help based on mutual respect and adherence to international law.

Iran’s leadership, based on domestic legitimacy and international credibility due to the principled stance and independence in decision-making, does not view negotiations merely as a way to prevent war, but as an opportunity to prove its right to prove its right. This treaty has mutual obligations; Including, providing access to non -state countries to peaceful technology, not their punishment for this demand.

leaked information from the negotiations shows that the step-by-step goal is to reach an agreement to provide a wider dialogue in the future. Iran believes that Trump’s two -month deadline is not enough to formulate a comprehensive agreement; Unless Trump returns to the previous agreement. Therefore, Tehran is looking for a transitional formula to keep the gates open to a comprehensive solution, without ignoring its rights.

is not hidden that Trump’s departure from the previous agreement was not just a political retreat but a declaration of the beginning of a policy of maximum pressure against Iran; The White House’s policy launched with the support of the Zionist regime and some regional governments. But what Washington did not properly calculate was Iran’s resistance; A country that did not only retreat but developed its peaceful nuclear program, increased the enrichment percentage and entered the negotiations with more power.

Trump believes that the threat will force Iran to retreat by dispatching military and military movements in the region. But experience shows that the more pressures increase, Iran becomes more resistant. Therefore, Tehran’s emphasis is on clear conditions for the negotiations: neither under pressure, nor an agreement that is disintegrated with pressure from the text.

Increasing the tensions that Trump and his allies follow are not only ineffective but a threat to the whole region. Any military adventure in these circumstances will be catastrophic and no one will be protected from its flames. The provocative actions of the occupation regime and the attempt to flare the fronts in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria are also meaningful in the same context; A framework that is only in favor of short -sighted projects.

On the other hand, Iran offers a mature model of political and diplomatic behavior: transparency to international inspections, interacting with various initiatives, and emphasizing the peaceful nature of the nuclear program. These are clear messages to the international community that Iran does not prevent dialogue but encourages; Of course within the framework of dignity and mutual interest.

in the economic dimension, Iran is well aware that the peaceful nuclear energy is the spine of sustainable development, especially in the light of increasing pressure on traditional energy sources. Therefore, the insistence on achieving nuclear technology is not a luxury nor a vain challenge, but a national necessity for employment, development of medical and industrial sectors, and accompanying the global technological revolution.

However, Iran’s perspective goes beyond the domestic sphere and reaches regional and international level. Iran believes that regional stability is not achieved by competing with arms or imposing will, but with respect to the sovereignty of countries and non -interference in their domestic affairs. Therefore, the nuclear deal is a step towards building a regional collective security system based on cooperation, not confrontation.

From this perspective, Muscat negotiations are not a purely technical case, but a mirror of a larger battle: among those seeking to impose new international order based on domination and arrogance, and those seeking to restore the rights of rights and rights. It is here that the difference between Trump’s trading approach and the Iranian -based approach shows sovereignty and dignity.

Iran’s position is not based on absolute negation, but is ready for a fair, comprehensive and applicable agreement. Iran, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency’s certificate, adhered to all the clauses of the previous agreement, and it was the American who violated it. Therefore, any new agreement must include real guarantees, not promises that be violated by the first political change in the White House.

Current scene shows that the option of war will not bring strategic achievement for anyone; Rather, it will lead to the disruption of international unity, the creation of security vacancies, and the expansion of instability. While the negotiations – though difficult – open a window to hope, provided it is based on respect for the obligations, not the blackmail of nations.

The world looks at Muscat with worried eyes: Trump has decided to accept responsibility for leaving the previous agreement? Or is it seeking a new agreement to guarantee only his economic interests – including market prices, even at the expense of international principles? The answer is not yet clear. But what is certain is that Iran – as it has proven many times – does not deal with its sovereignty nor abandons its legitimate rights.

, therefore, negotiations in Muscat not only represent Iran’s superiority, but also a real test for Trump itself. Does he have the political courage to accept new facts? Or will it continue to insist on the stubborn path and imposing its will, so that no regret will benefit anymore?