Iran has successfully managed the negotiation process tactically
href = “https://www.mehrnews.com”> Mehr News Agency , International Group : Muscat, the capital of Oman, has attracted the attention of the international community. These negotiations, which are in the form of nuclear talks aimed at reducing tensions and lifting sanctions, represent Iran’s superior hand; Because Iran has firmly stated that it refuses to conduct direct negotiations and emphasizes that all dialogue should be within the framework of its nuclear program. According to international experts, this approach reflects Iran’s strong stance on the United States.
about negotiations in Oman, which is the first meeting of Barack Obama’s presidency, both Iran and the United States have announced that discussions on the nuclear program were productive and effective. This can be seen as a positive sign for the future of negotiations. However, the productivity of the next round of negotiations depends on the level of readiness of the parties to dialogue in equal conditions and acceptance of interrelated claims. The main challenge in this process is Iran’s unwillingness to abandon the uranium enrichment program against the US insistence on a complete stopping of the program. The United States wants to restrict Iran’s nuclear capacity, otherwise it has kept the possibility of military action on the table.
, on the other hand, Iran emphasizes that its nuclear activities are merely for peaceful and energy-efficient purposes and will not abandon its right to uranium enrichment. Therefore, the key question is whether the two parties can reach an understanding on the nuclear issue. Meanwhile, the atmosphere of mistrust created after the US unilateral withdrawal from the Brigham in year 6 by the Donald Trump administration has had a negative impact on negotiations. The internal political pressures that the Trump administration faced in the event of disagreement made the negotiations more complicated.
From Iran’s perspective, the economic crisis and heavy pressure of sanctions, along with the weakening of the regional position after the fall of the Assad government in Syria, have led Tehran to take a cautious and strategic approach to negotiations. The possibility of using these factors as a pressure tool is another serious obstacle on the path of negotiations. Finally, the two sides must seek long -term stability and cooperation rather than focusing on short -term gains. Iran should not simply seek to lift sanctions or prevent US -Israeli military threat, and the United States should avoid using a military threat as bargaining tool. Being at the threat -language negotiating table will be a serious obstacle to the progress of the talks. Therefore, in order to succeed in the negotiations, both countries must take realistic and basic steps to maintain regional peace and improve bilateral relations.
There are two important points in the negotiations; First, these negotiations are conducted indirectly at Iran’s request; Secondly, the talks continue only within the framework of Iran’s nuclear issue. Many experts evaluate the realization of these two demands as Iran’s superiority in these negotiations. What do you think about this?
Process negotiation is based on problem solving and collective will. In cases where there are threatening elements between the parties, indirect negotiation is usually preferred instead of direct negotiation. Indirect negotiation can help create a more flexible and favorable atmosphere to achieve a solution between the parties.
There is a historical tension between Iran and the US. Therefore, from Iran’s point of view, negotiations can be directly regarded as a privilege and lead to social or political reactions. Despite the difficult economic conditions, Iran has been able to provide a reconciliation image by taking a resilient position against the United States and at the same time constructively against Western countries. This has led to the interpretation of public opinion that Iran has been superior to the negotiations. It can be said that Iran has successfully managed the process of negotiations tactically. However, US sanctions are still in place, and the fundamental issues between the parties have not yet reached a sustainable solution.
Turkey is one of the countries that oppose sanctions against Iran. What is the current view of the Ankara government on Iran -US negotiations? How will the success of these negotiations affect Türkiye, especially on Tehran and Ankara’s relations?
The Ankara government has always supported regional and global peace within the framework of the principle of “peace in the country, peace in the world,” the Ankara government has always supported regional and global peace. In this regard, the indirect negotiations between Iran and the United States are important not only for regional stability but also for Turkish national security. Türkiye does not oppose the development of nuclear activities for peaceful purposes and energy production, but opposes the production and expansion of nuclear weapons. This issue is directly related to Turkish security interests.
, on the other hand, economic sanctions against Iran have negatively affected the trade relations between Turkey and Iran. Therefore, the successfulness of negotiations between Iran and the United States will not only help reduce regional tensions, but it will also have a positive impact on Turkey and Iran’s economic relations.
When we are witnessing various crises in the region and practically the Zionist regime is unhappy with the US-Iran negotiations?
Talks between Iran and the United States are both promising and challenging because tensions caused by the developments in Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen and Syria have caused problems between Iran and the United States. These are issues that can interfere with the process of negotiations. Talks are an opportunity to create a peaceful atmosphere in the region. I think this process will be quite challenging. Therefore, the parties to the negotiations should avoid as much as possible from the influential internal and external factors that may hit the negotiation process.
on the subject of internal factors affecting the negotiation process, the desire of the parties to compromise is a key step in achieving the solution. However, unpredictable diplomatic strategies of the US President can disrupt the negotiations; The Trump administration’s demands to impose restrictions on Iran’s missile programs and end Iran’s support for resistance groups in the region could challenge the negotiations. In terms of the role of external agents, Israel’s negative attitude to the negotiation process, opposition to any compromise, and its approach to completely dismantled Iran’s nuclear facilities make it difficult to negotiate. In addition, another obstacle to the negotiations is the lack of protection of the Arab countries of the region.
