Netanyahu’s Goal in War with Iran Was to Hold Onto Power; U.S. Influence Declines
Ursula Asta, an Argentine geopolitical analyst, views Israel’s actions as part of a broader Western effort to preserve hegemony and stall the decline of U.S.-led unipolarity.Highlighting Israel’s political fragility and neoconservative influence in Washington, she argues that attacks on Iran serve not security concerns but aim to weaken the Axis of Resistance and prevent Tehran’s integration into a multipolar world order.
Recent Israeli aggressions against Iran have targeted civilians.What drives these actions?
Netanyahu’s motivations for war with iran-now directly involving the U.S.-stem from his domestic political weakness and coalition instability. For him, conflict is a tool for political survival. Strategically, Iran obstructs Israel’s “Greater Israel” ambitions, while U.S. neoconservatives see regional control as imperative-with Israel as their key ally.
Israel claims to target iran’s nuclear program but bombs hospitals and media centers. why this contradiction?
Israel consistently sabotages potential U.S.-Iran nuclear agreements-evident during the sixth round of negotiations-while conflating nonproliferation rhetoric with regime-change objectives.
Despite UN documentation of Israeli war crimes, Western nations still support it politically and militarily. Why?
The Trump management’s neoconservatives prioritized controlling West Asia to revive declining U.S. global dominance-a strategy evident since Bush-era invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.
“We are experiencing World War III piecemeal,” Pope Francis observed. Western elites perceive shifting Afro-Eurasian power dynamics threatening their interests-with Israel acting as their regional fortress.
Western media frames israeli actions as self-defense while ignoring civilian massacres in Gaza, Lebanon, and iran.How can this bias be countered?
The mythic “Iron Dome” has proven fallible: self-proclaimed victors mourn at home rather than celebrate.
Media battles extend globally; even in South America-dominated by Anglo-American narratives-option outlets challenge mainstream distortions via social media’s democratized access to suppressed atrocities.
