Analyzing Israel’s Actions After the Sharm El-Sheikh Agreement; The Farce of “American Peace” in Gaza
webangah News Agency, International Desk: The Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, justified by the death of one of its soldiers in Rafah, have once again revealed the true nature of this regime and its Western backers. This is not Israel’s first breach of a ceasefire, but it stands out as one of the most serious cases in recent months.The assault not only blatantly violated the Sharm El-Sheikh agreement but also symbolizes the complete failure of what is known as “American peace” in West Asia-a peace built less on political and humanitarian realities than on Washington’s and tel Aviv’s interests.
In the days leading up to this attack, Israeli forces launched sporadic assaults across Gaza, citing Hamas’ failure to return their prisoners’ bodies as justification. Meanwhile, military experts and international observers emphasize that locating bodies amid millions of tons of rubble covering all parts of Gaza-with no specialized search equipment available-is highly difficult if not impossible. Nevertheless, Tel Aviv used this excuse to resume its aggression-an excuse suspicious from inception for being politically staged.
Peace Born from war Policies
The recent events analytically confirm that US-mediated peace plans are designed not to end conflicts permanently but to recreate fragile temporary balances. History shows that Washington-especially under Donald Trump-never pursued lasting human-centered peace; rather it treated peace as a strategic tool for reinforcing influence and supporting Israel.
The so-called “Trump 20-point Peace Plan” for Gaza fits within this framework. Presented under slogans promising an end to two years of conflict in gaza, it was actually an effort to impose Tel Aviv’s demands and disarm Palestinian resistance. Hamas clearly understood the deceptive nature behind this american initiative and rejected full acceptance; later events verified their position. The recent Israeli attacks followed with Washington’s green light alongside Trump’s belittling threats against Hamas after these assaults-proof that America acts less as a guarantor than as an active participant violating ceasefires.
A Tarnished Record: Israel’s Breach of Commitments
Israel’s violation of ceasefires is neither new nor accidental but part of long-standing behavior since its establishment-it has failed to uphold any agreement reliably. From Oslo Accords in the 1990s through repeated truces with gaza, border understandings with Lebanon, up to Sharm El-Sheikh accords-the signature from this regime has often signaled imminent violation rather than commitment fulfillment. Lebanon exemplifies such unreliability starkly.
According to international organizations’ data, as signing ceasefire agreements with Beirut until now Tel Aviv has breached them over four thousand times. Today similar patterns repeat in Gaza under policies labeled “semi-active war,” where Israel tries maintaining conditions between war and truce-a scenario reducing global pressure while preserving military strength for future offensive actions when desired. yet this approach reflects neither strength nor resolve but rather reveals desperation by a regime increasingly isolated worldwide after two years without decisive results from prolonged conflict. Continuing such tactics undermines both Israeli political legitimacy internationally and erodes faith in international mediation efforts altogether.
The Cadaver Pretext: A Tactic Perpetuating War
Lately delayed delivery of Israeli prisoners’ bodies has become central propaganda material for Tel Aviv media campaigns alike-even though Palestinian resistance previously released twenty live captives during earlier stages consistent with agreements handed over through mediators-and rather Israelis exploited issues surrounding deceased prisoners supposedly obstructed by Palestinians-as pretexts justifying renewed military operations against Gaza.
Palestinian analysts such as Hani al-dali argue precisely that obstacles posed by Israeli forces themselves prevent access or recovery efforts regarding those remains due partly because some are located within areas Israelis had agreed fully vacating throughout accords forbidding Palestinian personnel from entering certain sectors entirely; others lie amid collapsed tunnels inaccessible without specialized gear rendering retrieval effectively impossible at present conditions.
Military commentators including Brigadier General Hassan Jouni observe othat Tel Aviv employs these circumstances tactically-to enforce what they call new “on-the-ground realities” permitting limited or broad strikes against Gaza whenever chosen without formally proclaiming ceasefire breaches-the very strategy previously implemented along southern Lebanese frontiers now replicated systematically along Gazan lines too.
The United States: Peace Guarantor or Accomplice?
The US role has crystallized especially following statements by former President Trump who assumed prominence claiming mediatorship yet practically granted Israel complete freedom operationally across both Lebanese borders & Gazan territories.according analysesWashington does more than tolerate violations-it actively facilitates ongoing warfare through diplomatic backing plus sharing intelligence & arms supplies.This stance aligns predictably within broader American foreign policy history where every instance hosting supposed mediation-from Camp David through Oslo Accord(s),Arab Peace Initiative up till notably “Deal of The Century”-shares intent centered on entrenching Zionist dominance & denying Palestinian national rights effectively indefinitely.
Conclusion
The latest developments around Gaza alongside actions following Sharm El-Sheikh underline once more how any peace emerging out from occupation & discrimination lacks authenticity.Washington & Tel Aviv wield “peace” rhetoric strategically pushing forward militarized-political agendas aiming ultimately at weakening resistance while fortifying structures rooted deep into occupation.Alongside targeted narratives crafted within Western outlets portraying Israeli aggression mistakenly framed merely defensive-the reality combined with ancient evidence firmly contradicts resurgent myths.Palestinian resistance meanwhile historically evidences adherence toward humanitarian-political accords where reciprocity exists.
What unfolds today across Gazan territories results not from rebellious defiance alone,but deliberately maintained limbo sustaining instability serving ongoing occupation tactics enabling tactical leverage over adversary.Financially termed ‘American peace’, it represents no genuine reconciliation nor even substantive truce.This spectacle recycling fresh labels disguises unchanged content: perpetual impasse maintained until illegal occupation blockade & systemic discrimination persist unchallenged cycles ensuring any signed deal-even those concluded at iconic venues like Sharm El-Sheikh or White House-fail delivering durable stability.
