Get News Fast
Supporting the oppressed and war-torn people of Gaza and Lebanon

Identifying Foreign Actors in the Sudan Crisis: What Roles Do Washington and Tel Aviv Play?

In Sudan’s civil war disaster, alongside historical and domestic factors, a range of interventions by foreign actors-each pursuing ‍their own interests-are evident.

According to the English section of webangah News Agency, citing Mehr News Agency and Euronews, following the​ Rapid Support Forces’ capture of⁢ El Fasher, Sudan’s future-once the largest ⁤Arab country and ⁤a vital ⁢food basket-is now at⁣ risk. The threat of ⁤fragmentation in western regions is emerging on its political horizon.

The fall of El Fasher-the last major regional stronghold outside⁤ Rapid ⁣Support Forces control-is a decisive geopolitical shift and marks the start of ‌a new⁤ phase towards‌ Sudan’s disintegration.

The‍ seizure grants terrorists access to essential border crossings with Chad and Libya, securing⁤ continuous supply lines for weapons and fuel.

A: Domestic Foundations ‌of⁤ Sudan’s Crisis

Analysts‍ argue this​ progress cannot be separated from Sudan’s historical crises. Once one of the world’s ⁤largest⁤ gold producers, years of successive wars have​ pushed over 24 million peopel to the brink of ‌famine, leaving many ⁢unable to secure daily food supplies. Key internal foundations underpinning Sudan’s crisis include:

Begining ⁣of Crisis (1985-1998): This period started with the 1985 overthrow of President Jaafar Nimeiry and ended with Omar al-Bashir’s 1989⁤ coup backed⁣ by Islamist factions.

Darfur Wars ⁤(2003): ⁤Long-standing ⁤tensions between Arab tribes and African tribes over land and⁣ water erupted into conflict.⁤ Clashes between ‍regional rebels ‌and government​ forces supported by Janjaweed militias resulted in around 300,000 deaths and millions displaced.

The Janjaweed were Arab tribal militias initially supported by al-Bashir early in his rule; in 2013 they were formally integrated as units ‌under national intelligence agencies.

South‍ Sudan Secession (2005-2011): South Sudan’s separation in 2011 marked⁤ a turning point⁢ after nearly five decades marked by ethnic-religious disputes, resource conflicts over oil fields, intermittent wars leading to more than two million‌ deaths, widespread displacement, deepening divisions between North and South Sudan.

Extensive‌ Peace Agreement (2005): this internationally mediated accord granted six⁤ years’ autonomy to southern regions before formalizing South Sudanese independence.

Referendum & declaration of Independence: In January 2011 an internationally ⁤supervised referendum saw 98.83 percent vote for secession; on july 9 that year ‌South Sudan officially declared ⁢independence.

Coup & Civil War ‍(2019-2023): A massive​ popular uprising ousted Omar al-Bashir in 2019 after three‌ decades in power. The transitional period that followed gave authority to a Sovereignty Council led by General Abdel ⁤Fattah al-Burhan-the army commander-and his deputy General Mohamed Hamdan dagalo (“Hemedti”), head ⁣of‍ the Rapid Support Forces. Soon after cooperation⁣ fractured over key issues including:

  • Merging Rapid Support Forces: Disagreements on methodology and timeline for incorporating approximately 100,000 RSF fighters into regular army ranks;
  • Military Command: Conflicts regarding who would command unified armed forces;
  • Looting Power & Wealth: Mutual suspicions concerning each side’s motives for retaining control ‌over governance structures while appropriating ⁢state economic resources.

The civil‌ war⁢ erupted on ​April 15, 2023-following prolonged tensions due to redeployment across several areas perceived provocation ‍by regular military-in Khartoum and other locations. ⁤The clashes rapidly⁢ escalated into full-scale warfare as RSF seized much control over the capital; though intense ‌fighting led ​defence forces regained main sectors by March 2025.

B: Foreign Backers Supporting Rival Factions in ​Sudan

Besides internal historic roots ,regional international players have amplified sudan ‘s crisis⁣ .‌

Multiple international circles including united nations acknowledge worldwide dimension ⁤.,repeatedly urging ​dispensers from interference forcing halt support especially toward rapid support forces implicated committing numerous atrocities . secretary general antonio guterres delivered stern Security council warnings recently emphasizing external involvement undermines peaceful solutions calls-for cease ⁣arms supply escalation continuances .

International ​supporters Of ​ rapid response ⁣force :​

Ethiopia And Eritrea : Both extend backing virtually mirroring alliance against freedom⁣ front tigray rebel group receiving arm assistance from sudanese‌ military itself.. Their ‌combat synergy against mutual adversaries indicates complex triangular strife relations going beyond borders,.⁢

United Arab Emirates And Chad :This includes ⁤accusations directed chad facilitating weapon⁢ transfers supplied manly via u.a.e.,‍ converging traffic veins targeting strategic hubs such as Abuishi , um ‌jarras representing operational bastions expanding reach rsf joint ⁢safeguarding these posts underscoring critical role.Description更], United Arab emirates funded hospital provisioned refugees sey Abuishi – emplacements⁤ purportedly exploited‍ fortharms traffickings ⁤logistics drones ⁢supply ⁤resourcements⁣ helping insurgents thriving battlefield operation continuity .‍

The Libyan General Khalifa Haftar has also been ⁢supporting⁤ RSF through arms smuggling facilitation along with deploying militias helping ⁤reinforce ⁤their frontline capacities .

C: SUPPORTERS⁣ OF SUDAN’S REGULAR ARMED FORCES

​ Egypt : Historical precedent since british colonial era ⁤leads substantial consistent military backing continued till present.

Russia : From historical perspectives commonly built ties support their military ⁢strength secreting interest setting up naval base at port sudan enhancing ⁤long-term influence projection .

Turkey and Qatar :⁣ Ankara provides Turkish Bayraktar⁢ drones equipping⁢ army hands-on modernization path while Doha assures political‍ endorsements reinforcing ⁤legitimacy amid turmoil.

” D role Of US AND ISRAEL ⁣IN SUDAN CONFLICTS “

United States maintains dual strategy aloud diplomatic supporting presence ⁣intensification inside⁢ Khartoum layering sanctions intersectionally punishing‌ backers amongst contending sides⁣ balancing ⁤reaping​ economic gains including related arms deals additionally⁣ leveraging foothold controlling⁢ maritime Yemeni Somali boundaries adapting broader geopolitical endeavors relative security framework.

< p dir= ⁢rtl styl ​e=text – align ::justify;”>Israel aims completing normalization process under Abdel ‍Fattah Al-Burhan condition political-military grants furthermore official statements⁢ revealed⁣ Burhan envoy⁢ visited ‌occupied territories april ‍describing readiness satisfying advancement terms acceleration accords meanwhile‍ Israeli regime manipulates ⁤conflict‍ extensions bolster vested interest profiting asymmetrical northern Africa repositioning ⁢outcomes.

Humanitarian Catastrophe Resulting ‌from ⁣Conflict In ​Sudan ‌

According ​UN ⁣report war waged ⁣amidst,Sudanese Government Armed Forces vs Rapid Support‌ Forces claimed tens thousands civilian lives inflicted​ catastrophic displacement forcing thirteen million internally displaced persons plus ten million rendered homeless ‍enormous suffering among women girls abducted widespread sexual violence utilized terror tool behind several forced suppression conducted RSF aggravations.Services decay witnessed sabotage hospitals livelihood‌ looting⁢ sudden exacerbations starvation‍ particularly Darfur territory where ‍populace ​resort fate ​tragic consumption fodder further confirming today Africa worst-scale humanitarian ⁣emergency unfolding directly due armed struggles ​devastating effects local communities equity survival.

News Sources:⁢ © webangah News Agency,

English channel of the webangah news agency on Telegram
Back to top button