From the accusation of falsification of the resignation letter to the indirect connection with the naturalization; What is the reason for the dismissal of Mohammad Al-Halbousi from the presidency of the parliament?

According to Tasnim International Group, the Supreme Constitutional Court of Iraq issued a ruling to cancel the representation of “Mohammed Al-Halbusi” in the Iraqi Parliament. According to this ruling, Al-Halbousi will lose his parliamentary seat and consequently cannot hold the presidency of the legislature.

Supreme Court of Law Asasi issued this verdict based on the complaint of two representatives named “Laith Al-Dulaimi” and “Basem Khashan”. It is noteworthy that the Supreme Constitutional Court has also ordered the cancellation of Leith Al-Dulimi’s membership.

The story of Bassem Khashan’s complaint

Basem Khashan is one of the independent representatives who entered the parliament, who was considered among the full-fledged opponents of al-Halbousi from the very first days. He recently announced that he had obtained documents that “end the political life of al-Halbousi!” He submitted these documents to the Supreme Constitutional Court, and now with the court ruling, it seems that the truth of Bassem Khashan’s claim has been confirmed!

According to the ruling of the Supreme Court, Al-Halbousi, as the head of the “Progress Party” signed a contract with a foreign company that has a role in normalizing relations between the Zionist regime and a number of countries, and one of the biggest advisers of that company is “Ehud Barak”, the former prime minister of the Zionist regime.

According to the law of “criminalization of naturalization” (criminalizing any kind of effort towards the recognition of the Zionist regime), no politician has the right to cooperate with several companies. A nationality with Zionist shareholders should sign a commercial contract. Also, no party or official has the right to sign a contract with a company whose one of its specialties is normalization. =”text-align:justify”>The story of Laith Al-Dulaimi’s complaint goes back to the fact that the named person was a member of “Tadegh Party” (headed by Mohammad Al-Halbousi); But after a while, he aligned himself with his political rivals and resigned from the Tohadad party. At that time, it was pretended in the media that his resignation was not only from the “Parliament Party faction” but also from the “parliamentary representative”! Al-Halbousi, in his capacity as the Speaker of the Parliament, officially announced the acceptance of Leith Al-Dulimi’s resignation and initiated the process of his replacement. Iraqi elections, if one of the members of the parliament resigns, his seat will go to the candidate who has the highest number of votes in the same constituency among the candidates who did not run. In other words, if three people enter the parliament from one constituency, if one of them resigns, his seat goes to the fourth person from the same constituency.

A little later, Leith Al-Dalimi announced that he never resigned from the parliament and that the resignation letter attributed to him was forged by al-Halbousi! In this context, he complained to the Supreme Constitutional Court.

/end of message