The attempt of America and England to justify military aggression with ridiculous excuses
The representatives of the United States and the United Kingdom claimed in the Security Council on Tuesday morning that the purpose of aggressive attacks on Iraq, Syria and Yemen is to protect the freedom of shipping and the American military. |
According to the report of Fars News Agency International Group, the members of the United Nations Security Council gathered on Tuesday morning to review the US military aggression in parts of Iraq and Syria.
The British representative in the United Nations claimed during a speech at the Security Council meeting: “The purpose of our actions in the Red Sea is to save human lives and protect the freedom of international navigation”.
Violation of Yemen’s sovereignty has carried out aggressive attacks on this country, he added: “We condemn the attacks of militias supporting Iran in the Middle East”. He considers the American unacceptable, but he has no problem with the killing of several thousand West Asian people, he claimed: “Our goal is to protect the Americans!” Continuing his claims, he said: “We don’t want conflicts to spread in the region and we are trying to contain the conflict in Gaza. We also warned Iran about attacking the Americans, but it could not restrain its proxy forces.” This regime and the ships whose destination is occupied Palestine have not been allowed to pass through the Red Sea and the Bab al-Mandab Strait. In continuation of its support to Tel Aviv, after the intensification of Yemen’s operations against Zionist ships, the United States formed a coalition to confront the armed forces of Yemen and has so far invaded this country’s territory several times.
Previously, “Mohammed Al-Bakhiti”, a senior member of the Ansarullah Resistance Movement’s political office, said on Monday morning in response to the repeated US and British military aggression in Yemen that these attacks are fruitless. (more details)
publisher | Fars News |