Iran’s possible response to Zionist aggression from the perspective of “X” users

Mehr News Agency, International Group : The attack by the Zionist regime on the Iranian consulate building in Damascus and the martyrdom of a number of commanders of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in this attack has triggered a wave of negative reactions in the region and the world.

In addition to the fact that some governments have issued statements condemning this offensive attack, which is a clear violation of international laws on diplomatic centers, the public opinion of the world also condemned this action. The unconventionality of the Zionist regime has not been accepted.

Meanwhile, English and Arabic-speaking users in the virtual space, addressing this issue, expressed different views regarding the unfair behavior of the West and the Security Council regarding the attack on the Iranian consulate. They reflected the intention and behind the scenes of this attack as well as how Iran responded to this aggression.

>

Looking at the tweets of the users, the double behavior or in other words the policy of “one roof and two airs” of the Security Council as well as Europe and America in the face of the Zionist attack The Iranian consulate in Damascus is highlighted.

“Mahlingam” defense analyst and retired officer of the Indian Army emphasizing that “the attack It was “deliberate”, one feels sorry for the Western diplomacy and their diplomats because they did not even express their condolences for the people who lost their lives in this attack.

This Indian military-defense analyst is referring to the emergency meeting of the Security Council on Tuesday, which was held to investigate the Zionist regime’s attack on the Iranian consulate.

During this meeting, the majority of 15 permanent and non-permanent member countries of the Security Council, the Zionist regime condemned and criticized for violating international conventions and trying to escalate tension in the region. Meanwhile, America, England, France, Japan and South Korea refused to condemn the Zionist regime.

Lebanese-American author and risk analyst Nasim Nicholas Taleb, in a post, video of John Mearsheimer’s speech ” confirms the distinguished professor of political science and the founder of the theory of aggressive realism, which a user reposted. He writes that Mearsheimer clearly explains why America supports Israel even against its own interests or any other moral principle due to the influence of this regime’s lobby.

Another user pointed the tip of the accusation towards the European actors and, like the previous post that referred to the “lobby” on America, to the influence of the “mafia” on the union Europe emphasized; An issue that, from this user’s point of view, has caused the union to have a double perception of the laws and to measure whether “the laws are in their favor or not”.

“Arnaud Bertrand” who is an entrepreneur, contrary to the approach of America, France and the European Union praised Norway and emphasized that “Norway is the only Western country that has condemned the attack on the Iranian consulate by Israel.”; Condemnation of the attack by Norway has attracted the attention of many other users.

“Ebrahim Zabad” is a professor of political science and director of the international studies program at “Sant Bonaventure” of Zambia evaluated the positions of Brussels as “rhetorical” because the European Union had not firmly condemned this attack and emphasized: if Iran had bombed the Israeli consulate in another country , the European Union would demand sanctions and NATO would probably intervene.

Views of users about the purpose of the Zionist regime to attack the consulate

An Arabic-speaking user named “Mashal Abdul Karim Al-Jarba” emphasized in this regard: the attack To the Iranian consulate in Damascus, crossing all the red lines is a definite proof of the defeat and wandering of the Zionists. This regime, which is heading towards destruction, is trying to disrupt the situation in the Arab countries and expand the circle of conflicts so that its allies enter into conflict with the axis of resistance.

On the other hand, Wali Nasr, a professor at John Hopkins University, believes that the goal of the Zionist regime is to provoke Iran, and now the ball has fallen in Tehran’s court. This prominent professor of international relations, however, emphasizes that Iran probably will not allow Israel’s narrative to change from Gaza to Syria and Iran.

“Alex Kennedy”, another user, spoke about the caution of the Iranian authorities in responding to the Zionist regime and wrote from the words of political analysts that “this attack can be a trick to pull Iran should be in direct conflict.”

How does Iran respond to the Zionist regime?

Some foreign users believe that Tehran’s response by strengthening the resistance front should be strategic, and some also believe that it is necessary for Iran to give a decisive response and it will definitely do so. .

The user posted a video showing the Zionist invasion of stores and wrote: “The Israelis are terrified of war with Iran and are emptying their markets. “One thing is certain, and that is that Iranians always take their revenge.” This user emphasizes that the Zionist regime has played with fire and should be ready to burn in the fire.

Another user tweeted that “I am impatiently waiting for Iran’s reaction and retaliatory attack for the attack on its consulate in Syria.” He is hesitant as to whether Israel or America will be the target of Iran’s retaliatory attacks.

An Arabic user named “Manzer Al-Nahari” wrote in this regard: I prefer that Iran reserves the right to react instead of a retaliatory reaction. Iran’s reaction should be done by the axis of resistance, because America has failed during the revenge reaction in Yemen and the Zionist regime after the Al-Aqsa storm.

He added: Iran’s achievement in turning Palestinian stones into rockets, drones and weapons is enough to be considered a strategic reaction and reserve against the Zionist regime. is.

Another user emphasized in this regard: Iran does not directly respond to Israel’s attacks because it knows that Tel Aviv’s goal of dragging Tehran into a direct war should not be achieved. slow.

He added: Iran’s reactions to these attacks are always strategic. These reactions create a new foothold for Iran in the equation of security and deterrence. This time, Iran’s reaction will be in the same direction, that is, creating a change that will create a new foothold in the region for this country.

“Youssef Hassoun Nasrallah” another Arabic user wrote: To those who are waiting for a response Islamic Iran is the Zionist Provisional Regime, I say that they will witness this answer. This expectation has caused Israel to be in a state of readiness and fear of Iran’s reaction. This fear is part of Iran’s reaction.

Another user by the name of “Tanya” commented on the statements of “Mohsen Rezaei”, a member of the Expediency Council, regarding the decision of “Iran’s response to the aggression of the Zionist regime” And it will definitely be implemented”, he republished.

A Yemeni user named “Ahmed Ayez Ahmad” wrote in this regard: Iran’s military response and will show a suitable strategy for this aggression. This reaction is certain and will not be delayed. A reaction other than this will mean that Iran is facing the United States in a war that none of them wanted, and this is considered a gift from Tehran to the criminals of Tel Aviv.

«Nidal Al-Saba” Another Twitter activist writes in this regard: The attack on the Iranian consulate in Damascus has put the country in a difficult situation. If he responds to Israel, a major regional conflict may occur, the dimensions of which no one can predict. If he doesn’t answer, he will lose his image and because of this, Israel will carry out more attacks in Syria. Israel’s goal is to create new equations and Iran’s goal is to protect the rules of conflict.

Another Yemeni user named “Muhammad bin Rouzan” by publishing a post on this Bareh wrote: Iran’s response to this aggression should not be a normal reaction of the people, but it should be a calculated, powerful and firm response.

An interesting point is that many Arabic users like this user widely reported the news of the Zionist newspaper “Yediot Aharonot” regarding the closure of 28 embassies and consulates of this regime in the countries Different parts of the world republished for fear of Iran’s reaction.

“Joe Treusman”, the senior analyst of the “Foundation for the Defense of Democracies” (FDD) think tank, also believes that the Zionist regime, before attacking the Iranian consulate, would consider Tehran’s possible reaction. has carefully checked. From his point of view, Iran avoids direct confrontation with the Zionist regime and will most likely advance its anti-Zionist goals with proxy groups.

Conclusion

Foreign users of X, both English and Arabic speaking, in the case of the Zionist regime’s attack on the Iranian consulate, the dual behavior of Europe, the United States and the Security Council as the basis for the implementation of the provisions of international laws and conventions They criticize.

They envisioned goals for Netanyahu in this attack, of which “bringing Tehran into a direct confrontation” was considered the most important. “Expanding the circle of conflict” in order to involve the regime’s allies with the resistance axis is considered one of Tel Aviv’s other goals.

In relation to Iran’s possible reaction, users do not have a single point of view; Some are against a normal reaction of the people and believe that this response should be calculated, powerful and firm.

On the other hand, some consider the current fear of Zionist settlers to be an appropriate response from Tehran. Some also believe that Tehran should not fall into the trap of direct war with the Zionist regime and that strengthening the axis of resistance is the best strategic and calculated response. A solution that has been successful so far and has involved America with Yemen and the Zionist regime from all directions.