Al-Akhbar: The answer is definite resistance axis
According to Webangah News quoted by Mehr News, the Lebanese newspaper Al-Akhbar, from the tribunes close to the resistance axis, in a report referring to the assassination of martyr Ismail Haniyeh, the head of the political bureau of the Hamas movement in Tehran, considered this action a turning point in the current conflict process. And he emphasized that the region is facing a new stage in this way.
This newspaper, referring to the US coordination with the Zionist regime in carrying out this assassination, emphasized that this operation also has risks that are more than Tel Aviv can bear and it is possible The process of developments should be drawn towards more dangerous scenarios.
Al-Akhbar adds that the Zionist enemy has realized that it cannot separate the fronts supporting Gaza from it, in addition to the fact that the Zionist regime does not have the power to cope with this reality. And the expansion of the activities of these fronts will destroy the levers of Tel Aviv’s power and may cause dramatic internal consequences and deepen the crisis in the occupied territories. This concept was especially imprinted in the minds of the decision-makers of Tel Aviv after the failure of the previous options, and in this way, the leaders of the Zionist enemy, including the Prime Minister of this regime, Benjamin Netanyahu, tried instead of coexisting with the new conditions, which is considered a difficult option for Tel Aviv. Increase pressure to new levels. The recent assassinations, including the assassination of Martyr Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran, are a practical manifestation of this policy.
Messages of assassination of Martyr Haniyeh
The assassination of the head of the political bureau of the Hamas movement was a manifestation of Israel’s decision to destroy the leaders of the movement and all elements related to the planning for the Al-Aqsa storm operation. The choice of Tehran to carry out this assassination was also a tension-generating message for Iranian authorities that Tel Aviv wants to drag the arena of conflicts from inside the occupied territories to other resistance fronts, including Tehran.
This report adds that the Zionist regime has carried out a dangerous operational action in Tehran and Beirut, which increases the possibility of being drawn towards an all-out war. Of course, this possibility is not certain, but Washington and Tel Aviv want to test Iran and the axis of resistance in this way to see if these fronts will accept the risk of reacting to these attacks or not?
In this regard, Israeli Radio says that Yoaf Gallant, the Minister of War of this regime, told his American counterpart, Lloyd Aston, that “security relations between Tel Aviv and Washington are the basis of deterrence It is against Iran and its branches.” They want to pretend that in the event of any reaction from Iran or war, America will directly support the Zionist regime, so that they may dissuade them from reacting to this attack.
Al-Akhbar emphasizes at the end of his report that the definitive result of these developments is that despite any scenario that the war in Gaza and the region may face, it must be said that Regional developments have entered a new phase that will either lead to a regional explosion or provide a real alternative to stopping the war. Until these results are determined, the field arena will definitely witness an increase in tension and controlled conflicts between the parties.
