The evil of the Zionist regime against Iran was rushed and unsuccessful

Mehr News Agency, International Group, Elnaz Rahmatnejad: Morning On Saturday, November 5, the Zionist regime, during an act of evil, aggression and tension, destroyed targets in the soil. Iran was targeted. The vigilance of Iran’s air defense made the attack of the Zionist interim regime blind and unsuccessful.

The officials of the Islamic Republic of Iran have repeatedly announced that Iran will give a proportionate and decisive response to any attack in defense of its territorial integrity based on Article 51 of the United Nations Charter; If the Sadeq operation was carried out in the morning of Sunday 26 April in response to the attack of the Zionist regime on the Iranian consulate in Syria. This operation included more than 300 drones and missiles that were fired from Iranian soil towards the military targets of the usurping Zionist regime.

Ismail Hanieh the head of the political bureau of the Hamas movement was an official guest of Iran in order to participate in the inauguration ceremony of the president. His personal bodyguard was assassinated by the fake Zionist regime in Tehran on Wednesday, August 10 at 1:37 am.

The Zionists tasted the bitter taste of Iran’s revenge with the Sadiq 2 operation with the code “Ya Rasulullah” on Tuesday night, 10 Mehr, and the IRGC announced in a statement: “In response to Ismail’s martyrdom Hanieh, Seyed Hassan Nasrallah and Major General of Guards Abbas Nilforushan with 200 missiles targeting the occupied territories has placed.” 90 percent of Iranian missiles hit the target and three military airbases were targeted in this operation.

We don’t see evidence in the Western media about the Zionist society in crisis, but looking at this society, we realize that the basic foundations of this fake regime have failed and the army is tired and worn out. The army of the occupying Quds regime is in trouble to advance on the two fronts of Gaza and Lebanon. In terms of the morale and will of the military forces, it is dealing with great problems. When he calls, he can hardly recruit everyone for military service.

Jan Mearsheimer political science professor at the University of Chicago said: “What is happening right now is that Iran and the regime The Zionists are climbing the ladder of escalation of tension, and there is no evidence that the regime occupying Jerusalem has mastered the cycle of tension.

If you look at the outcome of this process, you will see that the result of this tension will end in a nuclear Iran, which will not be good news for the Zionist regime at all. The Zionists do not control the cycle of tension. They cannot defeat the Iranians in a meaningful way, and they are also unable to defeat Hezbollah and Hamas in a meaningful way.”

under the pretext of investigating the failed and evil attack of the Zionist regime against Iran, which was weaker than their claims, with Dr. Nasser Abu Sharif” representative of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad movement in Iran, we had a conversation, which is detailed below:

Mr. Abo Sharif your opinion about the importance and dimensions What is the recent evil of the Zionist regime against Iran? How much could this regime and its allies achieve their goals through this evil? Can this action of the fake regime be considered a military operation or was it merely a political action?

The attack of the Zionist regime against Iran is beyond a military operation and has a political aspect. This failed attack was carried out in order to scare Iran and show its power in front of the international community and the allies of the Zionist regime in the region. The main message of the mentioned attack is that the occupying Quds regime intends to insinuate that it can penetrate deep into Iranian soil and target its military facilities. But did he achieve his goal? In practice, the Zionist regime could not achieve significant success. Iran’s air defense was alert and timely to deal with this blind attack and was able to minimize casualties and damages. During this failed attack, five members of Iran’s air defense forces were martyred and it had no long-term strategic impact on Iran’s defensive or offensive capabilities. For this reason, this attack can be seen as a demonstration of the weak and limited power of the Zionist regime, which failed tactically and sought to create fear only symbolically.

What will be the scenarios of Iran’s response to the Zionist attack?

Iran has several options to respond to the failed attack of the Zionist regime. According to the statement of the supreme leader of the revolution, Iran neither hesitates nor acts hastily. The Islamic Republic of Iran will choose a prudent and appropriate response. One of the scenarios of Iran’s response is that this country will attack the interests of the Zionist regime by strengthening its support for its regional allies such as Hamas and Hezbollah, and in this way will send a decisive message to the aggressor Zionist regime that any aggression will not go unanswered. Another scenario of Iran’s response is that this country may avoid direct escalation of conflicts and try to condemn this aggression of the Zionist regime at the international level and show that a country is committed to international laws. This balanced response allows Iran to demonstrate its deterrent power while maintaining internal stability and avoid falling into the trap of an all-out war.

Despite the previous warnings of the Islamic Republic of Iran to some allies of the Zionist regime, some neighboring countries such as Jordan to the occupying regime Quds allowed to use the airspace of Sangh. What is your opinion about this?

Saudi Arabia and Jordan have announced that they have not provided their airspace to the Zionist regime to attack Iran. This position shows that these countries are not willing to directly intervene in costly regional conflicts. However, if it is proven that cooperation has taken place, this act is a clear betrayal of the rights of the Ummah and shows the conflict between the policies of some countries and the interests of the Arab and Muslim nations.

Allies of the interim Zionist regime in the region and any country that allows this regime to pass through its airspace to carry out attacks against the neighboring country, part of the expansionist strategy of the fake regime and strengthening its aggression. is in the region. With such policies, these countries not only weaken regional security, but also give the Zionist regime the opportunity to use neighboring countries as tools to achieve its goals, thus posing a serious threat to the security and stability of the region. brought.

Was the attack of the Zionist regime weaker than its claims? This attack was a military achievement for the fake regime?

The fake Zionist regime’s attack on Iran was tactically limited, and despite the large number of aircraft and sophisticated electronic equipment, it showed its weak points against Iran’s advanced defenses.

style=”text-a..”>

Iran’s air defense was able to counter this attack well and neutralized most of the Zionist targets. This preparation and effective performance of Iran’s air defense not only prevented major damage, but also showed that Iran has the ability to deal with major threats.

Although the attack by the Zionist regime led to the martyrdom of five Iranian air defense forces, it is a strategic failure for this regime and shows the limitations of its ability to face an organized and strong defense. gives The attack of the occupied Quds regime was a clear violation of Iran’s sovereignty. This fake regime sought political and symbolic goals, not military achievement; For this reason, his attack is considered a hasty and unsuccessful action.

Allies of the Zionist regime, whether they directly participate in this operation or watch, have a great responsibility towards their nations, because instead of defending the ideals of the Islamic Ummah and supporting The security and stability of the region, in collaboration with the occupying regime, help to disintegrate and weaken the region, and this will bring danger and instability to the entire region.

Hezbollah of Lebanon announced Sheikh Naim Qassem as the successor of Seyed Hassan Nasrallah and Seyed Hashem Safi Al-Din is selected. What does this choice mean, that immediately after this choice, the Minister of War of the Zionist regime, Gallant, reacted and said: “The temporary appointment will not take long.” Ili Cohen the Minister of Energy of the Zionist regime also admitted: “Whoever becomes the head of this party is a target of assassination!”

The election of Sheikh Naeem Qassem as the Secretary General of Hezbollah instead of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah has a decisive and meaningful message for the Zionist enemy and its allies. This decision shows that the Lebanese resistance is firm on its principles and is ready for a long battle. Sheikh Naeem Qasim, who has been in the front line of the resistance for many years alongside Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah, is a symbol of the continuation of the path of resistance and strength of Hezbollah.

By choosing Sheikh Naim Qassem as the successor of Seyed Hassan Nasrallah, Hizbullah sends this message to the Zionist regime that the resistance will not change and will not retreat from its goals. Sheikh Naim Qassem’s emphasis on preparation for a “long war” shows that Hezbollah will avoid compromise and will defend its land and rights at any cost.

The election of Sheikh Naeem Qassem as the new Secretary General is a message to America that sanctions and pressures will not affect the will of resistance. Sheikh Naeem Qassem also told the American ambassador: “You will not see the defeat of the resistance even in your dreams”, which shows the determination of the resistance in the face of foreign pressure.

The election of Sheikh Naeem Qassem as the successor of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah is not only a change of leadership, but also a strategic message to the enemy and friends of the resistance. Sheikh Naim Qassem is an experienced and respected figure in the Lebanese resistance, and this choice shows that Hezbollah is ready to deal with any threat or assassination of its commanders, and the enemy cannot shake Hezbollah with threats and assassinations.

In fact, the election of Sheikh Naeem Qassem announces to all the enemies of the resistance that Hezbollah adheres to its principles and is ready to pay any price for the freedom of its land. The enemy must understand that the resistance is not only not giving up, but with its new leadership, it is more ready than ever for greater victories.

Yesterday, Sheikh Naim Qassem gave his first speech after becoming the Secretary General of Lebanon’s Hezbollah. How do you evaluate their statements?

Sheikh Naeem Qassem’s statement that “fighters on the front line are martyrs” expresses the spirit of self-sacrifice that is deeply rooted in the Lebanese resistance. This approach discourages the enemy from any attempt to intimidate and pressure Hezbollah and shows that resistance against any threat is permanent.

The Secretary General of Lebanon’s Hezbollah emphasized that the resistance has destroyed and shot down “tanks and equipment of the enemy and drones And he performs his beats according to a regular schedule on a daily basis. This military capability shows that Hezbollah is capable of inflicting heavy blows on the Zionist regime and failing them to achieve their goals.

Sheikh Naeem Qassem pointed to the extensive psychological treatments that the Zionists need after the war, and this indicates the success of the resistance in the psychological battle against the Zionist regime. This increases the pressure on the Zionist society and weakens the power of the Provisional Zionist regime to continue the war.

Also, Sheikh Naeem asked the Zionist regime to withdraw from Lebanese lands to reduce its losses. This message is a serious threat to this fake regime, that Hezbollah is able to inflict heavy losses on them, and the only way to prevent these losses is to end the aggression.

The Secretary General of Hezbollah of Lebanon emphasized: “This battle requires sacrifice” and Hezbollah is ready to rebuild its territories after any destruction with the cooperation of the people. These statements show the readiness of the resistance to endure hardships and stability in the path of struggle.