Ben-Gurin’s legacy of “nothingness” in the relationship between Israel and international institutions
| The ugly and insulting behavior of the representative of the Israeli regime after the majority of the members of the General Assembly agreed to the membership of Palestine, is not an incident, but a fundamental school in the Zionist regime, which is rooted in its fake history, and accepts any international organization only when it serves this regime. be |
According to the international group Tasnim news agency, the ridiculous, insulting and out-of-diplomatic behavior of Gilad Erdan, the representative of the Zionist regime in shredding the United Nations Charter after the decisive vote of 143 countries in favor of Palestine’s full membership in the United Nations, has provoked many reactions.
.
Although Erdan has already shown behaviors far from diplomatic dignity And it seems that part of this behavior is due to his personal character, but on the other hand, finding the root of this issue brings us to an old concept in the politics of the Zionist regime. In fact, it seems that ignoring the logic of the United Nations and the selective use of its capacities is rooted among the Zionists, and it was raised for the first time by the first prime minister of this regime’s fake history.
Although the Zionist regime was born in a sense and is the result of the decision of the United Nations General Assembly and Resolution 181, but the policy of this regime in the following years is to issue many resolutions both in the General Assembly and in the Security Council of the United Nations. As a result, many of them were either against Israel or criticized Tel Aviv’s actions. David Ben-Gurin, the then prime minister of this regime (which also has the status of founding in Israel) in 1955, used the concept of “Umish Mom[1]” means “no recognition of the United Nations”.
after The proposal of this concept by the Prime Minister of Israel at the time, the policy of the Zionist regime towards the United Nations and international organizations in general changed and became a selective policy. The general concept of this strategy is that the Zionist regime wants international institutions only to serve itself, which means that whenever international organizations defend the interests of this regime, Tel Aviv will go along with them, and whenever they take action against Israel’s wishes, Israel will face severe neglect.
This policy was completed by placing the US umbrella over Israel and providing unquestionable and unlimited support to Israel. And it was extremely efficient. In this way, it can be said that the issue of disregarding international organizations, especially the United Nations, and actually standing up to the international will in the occupied territories has become a school since the early years of this regime.
Resolutions of the Security Council
So far, a total of 228 resolutions in Since 1949, the United Nations Security Council has issued resolutions on issues in which the Zionist regime was on one side. Israeli attacks against Palestinians, wars between Israel and Arab governments, discriminatory policies against Palestinians, and violations of international commitments and agreements are among the reasons for issuing these resolutions. Also, some resolutions of this council have been issued in support of the Zionist regime.
Among the 228 resolutions issued on these issues, 75 resolutions It is against the Zionist regime. Something that many audiences probably didn’t pay attention to. Among the mentioned 75 resolutions, 15 resolutions have an advisory tone and express regret for the actions of the Zionists, and 60 resolutions have a strongly anti-Israel tone.
A very large number The resolutions issued against Israel indicate several issues; First of all, this very large number shows that the Israeli regime, during its shameful 76-year-old life, has repeatedly committed behaviors and actions that could not be justified even by the logic of the supporters of this regime in the Security Council.
On the other hand, no change Israel’s behavior over the years is a sign of Tel Aviv’s deliberate, selective and organized disregard for resolutions issued against Israel. Among these cases, we can change the monitoring status of the city of Jerusalem, occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip and the Golan Heights, settlement construction in the West Bank, preventing Palestinians from returning to their homeland, occupation of southern Lebanon, bombings in Tunisia, assassination of several The Palestinian personality pointed out the attack on Iraq’s nuclear facilities and… , to demand compliance with the resolutions aligned with him from other governments. For example, resolution 1701 of this council asks the Zionist regime to completely evacuate the territory of Lebanon and hand over the territory of this country to the central government of Lebanon. In return for this action, the resistance groups have been asked to move their forces behind the Litani river, but the Zionist regime, which still occupies the village of Al-Ghajar and the fields of Shabaa, and violates this resolution by reading a part of this resolution many times. Hezbollah has accused Lebanon of violating the resolution and demanded that this group withdraw behind the litany. ) has called for a permanent halt to the construction of Zionist settlements in the West Bank, and while declaring these settlements illegal, he has considered them an obstacle to peace. Israel’s response to this resolution has been complete disregard and continued development of settlements at a faster rate. From this point of view, the Zionists still adhere to the strategy of nothingness as a legacy of Ben Gurin.
[1] או”ם שמום
| © | Webangah News Hub has translated this news from the source of Tasnim News Agency |
