Obedience of the occupiers to the orders of the Hague Tribunal and withdrawal from Gaza is a condition of negotiations

reported by Mehr News Agency, a senior member of Hamas announced in a speech that talk and hadiths about the readiness of the Zionist regime for a continuous ceasefire are not enough and it is necessary for this regime to immediately withdraw from the Gaza Strip and stop the war.

“Osame Hamdan” senior member of Hamas Shamgeh Saturday in an interview with Al Jazeera news channel in response to the enemy media report about Resuming the ceasefire talks during the next week after the Paris talks, he emphasized: The aim of the talks is to end the war in Gaza and lift the siege and fair exchange of prisoners from both sides.

The representative of Hamas in Lebanon emphasized that we have not been informed by the mediators about the resumption of negotiations.

Osame Hamdan added: Today’s talk about new negotiations is not serious.

Hamdan stated that we also believe that the Zionist regime seeks to evade the decisions of the International Court of Justice.

He said: We do not need a new negotiation and the Hamas movement has presented its response to the plan proposed by the mediators.

Osame Hamdan said: The question is what guarantee can be given regarding the Zionist regime’s agreement with new thoughts and ideas.

Hamdan added: If there is no serious guarantee, this means giving more time to the occupying regime to continue the war.

This Hamas leader emphasized that a proposal was made and we accepted it, but “Israel” opposed it, and there is no guarantee that this regime will accept new proposals to enter into negotiations. .

Osame Hamdan said that talking about the readiness of the Zionist regime for a continuous ceasefire is not enough and it is necessary for this regime to immediately withdraw from the Gaza Strip and stop the war.

Hamdan said: The current priority is to implement the ruling of the International Court of Justice and Biden should prepare to oblige the Zionist regime. to declare in accordance with this ruling.

He clarified that no proposal or plan from the Zionist enemy can be trusted and why should we agree to another plan after the recent proposal of the mediators which we accepted?