The priority of the enemy is to break the unity of the axis of resistance
Mehr News Agency, International Group, «
In the same direction and in order to study these issues, Mehr reporter has done with Hujjat al-Islam Dr. Ali Jaber, a member of the Central Council of Hezbollah in Lebanon, the text of which is as follows:
Sheikh Naim Qassem, deputy secretary general of Hezbollah in Lebanon, in his third speech on the strength of the resistance positions in Mesir Seyyed Shohdai resistance emphasized, what was your opinion regarding this speech and Areas How do you evaluate the power and strength that was mentioned in these words?
First of all, condolences to the martyrdom of Syed the martyrs of the Holy Way, Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah, Secretary General of Hezbollah in Lebanon. i do This is not the first time that the Islamic resistance and Hezbollah have faced a tough test at the level of losing their commander , of course, this also happened in 1992 and with the martyrdom of Allameh Mujahid Seyyed Abbas Mousavi. Naturally, the martyrdom of Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah was more painful, because he had a great position not only in Lebanon but in the entire region and the Islamic world. With his jihadi experience, he managed Lebanon’s Hezbollah as one of the most organized and strongest forces in the region and made this party pass difficult tests. . Today, we are witnessing the martyrdom of the Secretary General of Hezbollah and a large number of top jihadi commanders of Lebanon’s Hezbollah. In this situation, the speech of the deputy secretary general of Hezbollah was a strong speech that showed this courage and strength and this jihadi structure and faith.
Contrary to the idea of the Zionist enemy, who was under the delusion that Lebanon’s Hezbollah has suffered a painful blow and can no longer continue to Resistance Lebanon will be able to pass this great test.
The painful equation that Sheikh Naim Qassem talked about, the enemy and its internal mercenaries in Lebanon It has surprised and at the same time it has been met with positive interaction of the resistance and its supporters. What does this equation mean and can resistance implement it in the field?
Of course, the Islamic resistance has overcome the shock caused by the attacks of the Zionist regime in the initial stage. And it has managed to restore its cohesion and establish its presence once again in response to the aggressions of the Zionist regime. Now, in the second round, it has entered a new stage, which Sheikh Naeem Qasim has named as the “painful stage”. At this stage, Hezbollah has taken the initiative in confronting the Zionist enemy and its mercenaries.
Of course, these words were a shock to the enemy and all internal opponents who had counted on the enemy’s movements; is considered These opponents were the same ones who talked about the next stage of Lebanon’s Hezbollah in their media platforms, but the new equation surprised the enemy and these mercenaries, and they have realized that resistance is tougher than they thought and this current has the necessary and sufficient power to adapt to the current variables.
Of course, we can say that the implementation of this equation has begun. Resistance is able to implement this equation and started it through a drone attack on Benyamina region, which dealt a heavy blow to the Ighuz special forces of the Zionist regime. This attack carries the message that resistance can inflict painful blows on the enemy and change the equations. I believe that the resistance has many surprises in store, which Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah, the martyr commander of the resistance and these surprises are enough to stabilize this equation.
Sheikh Naim Qassem once again put the ball in the court of America and the supporters of the hypothesis of a ceasefire in Lebanon without They were proposing a ceasefire in Gaza, he dropped it and emphasized that the separation of Lebanon from Palestine and the separation of the region from the Palestinian cause is never possible. Who do you think the audience of these messages were and what effect will these messages have on the political process that some were looking for?
One of the goals of America and the Zionist regime in the war in Lebanon is to hit the military capabilities of Hezbollah and resistance Islam on one side and separating the fate of Lebanon from the Gaza issue on the other. Naturally, with this plan, they sought to separate the axis of resistance, because the separation of Lebanon from this equation of conflicts and leaving Gaza alone is a big blow to the unity of the fields in the resistance, but resistance Lebanon defeated this plan by faced and proved the centrality of resistance in the region of the unity of the arenas and this made the enemy weak and fragile in this war.
I believe saying this to prove the power of resistance not only in the field, but also It is enough in the process of political activities. Of course, in the field of political activities, it should be said that we will accept any indirect negotiation only under the shadow of interaction with this condition and based on this unity of destiny.
Israel is a danger to the entire region and attacks everyone, including those who are bystanders. will give This was the message that Sheikh Naeem Qasim also conveyed to others. Do you believe that such an image has been created in the eyes of the nations and governments of the region? What are the examples based on which Sheikh Naim Qasim raised this fact?
Of course, after more than a year of this criminal war and the actions taken by the usurping Zionist regime against Gaza and Lebanon, many in the Arab and Islamic world are watching. And they behave in such a way that this matter has nothing to do with them or that they observe an incident outside the Islamic world and have no responsibility for this incident. Their problem is not in being clear about this fact, because the danger of the Zionist regime for the entire region is completely clear in the eyes of all Arab and Islamic nations and even governments, the problem is that they have the necessary determination to act and provide the necessary support to span style=”text-a..”>Resistance
in Lebanon and Palestine do not have the strength to confront this aggression. We do not know when the real awakening will occur among the Islamic nations. We are all faced with all these dangers and challenges, and there are many signs confirming this fact and the threats of the Zionist regime, which proves that their project is not only limited to Gaza. It covers from Lebanon to Syria, Jordan, Egypt and other Arab countries. The Zionist idea, with the unlimited support it received from the United States, is looking for new developers to realize the project “from the Nile to the Euphrates”.
Iran does not have any project in the region, but its real project and ideal is the issue of Palestine and Along with other elements of resistance, they support this ideal with zeal. Why did Sheikh Naeem Qassem propose this idea and do you consider Iranophobia to be a part of the Zionist project?
In fact, the opposing governments of the Islamic Republic of Iran claim that Iran is seeking greed in the region. They talk a lot about the Safavid project and these issues have been raised repeatedly in recent months. They claim that Iran is greedy for the Persian Gulf region to the shores of the Mediterranean Sea. Naturally, these claims are to distort the regional priorities and abandon the confrontation with the usurping Zionist regime and ignore the Palestinian issue. This was something that Mr. Deputy Secretary General also pointed out and emphasized that Iran has no project in the region and its only project is the Palestinian cause. The cause of Palestine is the main priority of Iran and all movements of resistance and should be the main priority of all Arab and Islamic nations. Therefore, Sheikh Naeem Qasim tried to eliminate these hostile propaganda. We emphasize that the Iran-phobia followed by media horns opposed to the Islamic Republic is to divert public opinion from the real project of the Zionist regime. Of course, the current developments and heroism of resistance in Palestine and Lebanon, which are carried out with the support and fixed positions of the Islamic Republic of Iran, prove the falseness of this claim more than ever.
