Syrian developments, an opportunity that became a threat for Tel Aviv
According to Webangah News quoted by Mehr News Agency, the Lebanese newspaper Al-Akhbar in its report investigated the military movements of terrorist groups in northern Syria and under the control of the city of Aleppo, and wrote that this news at first sight can be considered as good news for Tel Aviv. , but it must be said that the inability of the armed elements to achieve victory The absolute and overthrow of Syrian sovereignty turns this opportunity into a threat for Tel Aviv, because it makes Damascus fall even more into the “arms” of Tehran, and other threats and enticements of the Zionist regime to separate the Syrian government from the axis of resistance are not an answer in any way. will not give.
In the first place, the Zionists may think that the control of the city of Aleppo by terrorist groups and the threat of the city of Hama can be good news for the Zionists and Iran in a distant space. from the borders of the Zionist regime, but this opportunity becomes a threat when we see that in the shadow of these developments, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s trust and reliance on Iranians and Russians will increase even more. does.
The best scenario for the Zionists is to draw a new map for Syria based on the control of Damascus by terrorist groups, but there are many doubts about the realization of this scenario. On the other hand, Türkiye knows very well that the current support cannot be useful for changing the strategic balance.
Even before the implementation of the ceasefire with Lebanon, Tel Aviv believed that more pressure should be imposed on Bashar al-Assad, even if these pressures were indirect. This issue was raised many times by Benjamin Netanyahu and a number of other ministers and people close to him, to the point where they threatened to assassinate Bashar al-Assad.
The security interests of the Zionist regime can be the reason for connecting the movements of terrorist groups in northern Syria with Tel Aviv. This relationship is not limited to encouraging terrorists, but to supporting and equipping them, albeit indirectly and with the cooperation of third parties, namely Turkey and the United States. But in this regard, there is a worrying point for Tel Aviv, and that is that the multitude of elements involved in Syria, who have different motives, can endanger this relationship.
At the end, this report emphasizes that although keeping the Syrian government busy can be considered among the interests of the Zionist regime, it is impossible to achieve this in the long run. Because it seems that the level of conflicts is limited and the intervening parties cannot have significant results for themselves like in the previous years when they created the civil war in Syria.
