Trump’s attempt to close the court cases January 6

According to the report of Fars News Agency International Group, “Donald Trump”, the former president of the United States, is trying to invoke another clause of the country’s constitution to justify his judicial immunity in civil cases related to the incident. warrant an attack on the US Congress on January 6.

According to “CBS News”, Trump plans to ask the US Supreme Court to reject his lawyers’ claim that Hear and examine that the immunity of the President of the United States should protect him from civil lawsuits related to the attack on Congress on January 6.

The request of Trump’s lawyers on Monday while It was mentioned that the US Court of Appeals stated in a ruling last month that the former US President cannot have the right to immunity from a civil lawsuit, according to which he was involved in the incident of “physical and mental injuries” to two police officers of the US Congress during the attack on The Congress building has been recognized as responsible in 2021.

In Trump’s case, the US Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., was asked on Monday to wait for his lawyers to leave the court before sending the case back to the lower court. Supreme Court to appeal. According to this request, it was decided that the court should wait until February 15 to review the Trump case, and the plaintiffs of the said case agreed to this delay.

This is a legal question. It is extremely important whether or not Trump actually had full immunity for his actions as President of the United States because he was the legal President of the United States at the time of the congressional rebellion. which must be answered before any ruling from the court.

In this regard, Trump has argued that any action he took on January 6 It is within the scope of his responsibilities as the president and this issue can give him immunity from civil liability cases. The appeals court rejected this view, however, leaving the way open for Trump to prove his claim in the case.

Trump’s lawyers claimed that his immunity to The title of president protects him from the criminal case presented by Jack Smith, the special investigator of the Trump case, that he tried to illegally invalidate the election results.

end of message