In what ways is the judgment of the Hague Court against Israel important?

According to the report of Fars News Agency International Group, the International Court of Justice announced its initial verdict on South Africa’s complaint against Israel last Friday and asked Israel to take all necessary measures to prevent the genocide in Gaza. .

This court also ordered Israel to report to this court based in The Hague within one month from the issuance of the verdict all the measures it has taken to prevent the genocide. Despite this, the Hague Court did not issue an emergency order to stop the war in Gaza, contrary to South Africa’s request. have known Despite this, some other analysts consider this ruling to be historical and consider the process of issuing it to be very important and meaningful.

The first and most important point about the importance of this ruling is that the Court The International Court of Justice has ruled against Israel. In fact, the judges of The Hague Court did not reject any of South Africa’s arguments about the possibility of genocide by Israel and considered it to be prosecuted.

International law experts say that the International Court of Justice 36 He devoted the first minute of his argument to explaining South Africa’s right to sue Israel, indicating that the court had not ruled out the possibility of genocide in Gaza.

For this reason, Friday’s preliminary verdict is considered as a kind of confirmation of genocidal actions by the Israelis. It contained very detailed and thoughtful points and wanted the Hague Court to condemn Israel for committing the crime of genocide.

In fact, conducting an investigation on such an issue and passing a verdict on it. It usually takes several years. South Africa’s request at the current stage was that the judges of the court first confirm that the possibility of genocide in Gaza is probable and that this case needs to be dealt with at a later stage, and secondly, by issuing a temporary ruling, prohibit Israel from carrying out acts of genocide and from the fundamental right. protect the Palestinians.

The court actually upheld both of the above cases by 15 votes to 2. One of the two judges who voted against is from Israel. In this meeting, the judges of the court decisively rejected Israel’s claim that its actions are being carried out in “self-defense”. He works at Keç University in Istanbul. In a note in Rashatudi, he wrote: “This verdict is a victory for South Africa and for Palestine and the Palestinians, and a heavy defeat for Israel, so that even the Human Rights Watch, which is a completely pro-Western organization, He has stated it clearly.”

One ​​of the other reasons that caused some people to consider the judgment of the International Court of Justice as less important is that this court does not have the power to implement its own judgments. . The guarantee of the implementation of the decisions of this court should be done through the approval of the resolution in the UN Security Council, and in this council it is clear that the US will not allow the approval of any resolution against Israel.

Despite This, even from the reaction of the Israeli authorities, it can be seen how much the issuance of this sentence has questioned Israel’s credibility and made it more difficult for them to continue the war.

end of message/