Great British military spending in the face of international developments/London is still far from its goals

According to the report of the international group Tasnim news agency, newspaper ” Tagus Shaw wrote in an article: “In the face of multiple crises, Britain spends more money on defense.” But apparently these expenses are still not enough, especially if the British want to maintain their leading role around the world. His words justified the British and American forces’ military attacks against the positions of the Yemenis in the House of Commons. According to his description, Yemenis have carried out 25 attacks on civilian ships in the past weeks and even attacked British and American ships. and emphasized the importance of free movement of goods for the global economy. The British government threatened more airstrikes if attacks on ships in the Red Sea did not stop.

This is part of British policy. to assume international responsibility. Sonak also traveled to Ukraine again on Friday to show the country’s support in the war against Russia. As the British Ministry of Defense announced, the British have trained 60,000 Ukrainian soldiers since the beginning of the war. But this international presence is expensive – and it is becoming increasingly difficult to raise the necessary funds for it. Delivered a keynote speech in which he defined a turning point for British defense policy. In his words, he emphasized: The Cold War is over, the Berlin Wall is a distant memory. The world is moving away from the post-war order towards a time when war is possible again. In this regard, Shapps pointed to North Korea, Iran’s nuclear program, China and increasing tensions around Taiwan.

He argued for a higher defense budget and said: the government It has spent more than £50 billion on defense for the first time. He added: “In 2024, we want to increase spending to 2.5 percent of annual economic output. To 2.5 percent, significantly more should be spent. In the framework of NATO, it has been agreed that the member countries should invest more than two percent of their annual economic production in defense.

British government announcements sound like a lot of money, but apparently still not enough. Britain’s nuclear missile arsenal is rotting and urgently needs to be renewed, a former senior government adviser has criticized. According to him, the costs are very high and there are no official figures.

Despite the high costs, one thing is clear: the British military’s ability to operate is limited. The British had to fly the Red Sea missions from an air base in Cyprus. Only one US warship was in the operational area.

This article continues: In December, a watchdog published a report on British military equipment. Accordingly, in order to maintain weapons systems in the next 10 years, there is probably a shortfall of about 25 billion euros. An even bigger defense budget is needed to stop this trend. Due to the increasing tension around the world, this problem is increasing. In his speech in London, Shapps asked all NATO member countries to adhere to the two percent goal.

On the other hand, if “Donald Trump” wins the American elections, Discussions about the defense budget are likely to become more important again. He has repeatedly stated that the United States of America will no longer play a leadership role in foreign and defense policy.

end of message /