Trump’s request to the Supreme Court to confirm his eligibility in the election

Fars News Agency International Group; Trump’s lawyers argued in a case filed before the Supreme Court that removed him from the Colorado ballot was an “anti-democratic” move. Now his lawyers are protesting the decision of the Colorado court to disqualify him from running in this state under the influence of the “anti-riot” clause in the constitution.

according to “USA” Today, Trump’s lawyers have stated in his support: “There was no riot” and President Trump did not “incite” anything. He did not “engage” in any act that would constitute “sedition.”

They cited a 1964 decision on state legislatures that The right to freely vote for the desired candidate is one of the hallmarks of a democratic society, and any restriction in this regard would strike at this principle.

The highest court of Colorado in In December, it was ruled that Trump is disqualified from running for president due to his role in trying to cancel the results of the 2020 election and the January 6 attack on the Congress building. This ruling was cited with reference to Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.

Trump has argued that these provisions should not apply to the president and even if such an event were to happen. Fall, his lawyers say, he was not involved in any rebellion. Trump’s request for an appeal has been put on hold until the Supreme Court rules on the Colorado case. , it is similar to the same anti-democratic action that Venezuela took during the elimination of a main candidate of the opposition party to participate in the presidential election. that if the court does not end his disqualification efforts immediately; Abe riots among his supporters as a sign of protest. Currently, Trump is leading the candidates of the Republican Party in the 2024 presidential election in November.

end of message