Researcher of Zionist military issues: The goals of the Gaza war are contradictory

according to the Hebrew group Tasnim News Agency, Colonel Hanan Shai, Senior Researcher of Meshgaf National Security Think Tank and An expert in military and political strategic planning and decision-making centers emphasized in a round table held on the Zionist TV channel 7: There is a significant contradiction between the two main goals of this war, on the one hand, we have stolen great value and importance for freedom. and on the other hand, we insist on destroying Hamas, both in its military and political structures, and in this framework, we seek to destroy as many of this group’s forces as possible.

But what became clear after announcing these goals was that we have encountered 750 kilometers of tunnels under Gaza, which would create dangerous problems for us if we leave them alone. Vared, in such a situation, it is very important to choose between the return of the kidnapped and the continuation of the war.

This Zionist expert further said: Regarding the abductees, it is only media information, but assuming that the announced details are correct, if it is possible to hand over all the abductees in front of a ceasefire and a cessation of hostilities, I will again. I support this solution.

The senior Zionist researcher said in another part of this meeting: We must admit that Hamas is a very successful action. and has managed to cause several internal conflicts in our country, we must also note that the passage of time is not in favor of the hostages and especially the elderly children, so if it is possible for them to return and if to do this, the Palestinian terrorists who We have categorized them as captives to be released, this should be done and after that we will open a new page.

According to this expert Zionist, Israel entered this war in unimaginable conditions, this time Israel was faced with an organized army that was not prepared to defend against it, the Israeli army was ready to enter into conflict and fight with (people) in the form of They were taking action individually, and to counter the invasion, he had not found an army with the ability to attack and advance regularly, which would also occupy a territory.

Actually, Hamas was an infantry force that managed to capture cities and towns and achieve the goals it wanted.

In contrast Such an attack, the Israeli army did not have any immediate plan within the framework of the principle of deterrence… High-ranking army commanders also announced that an organized plan to deal with such an attack was not prepared in the army headquarters, the reason is the structure of our deterrence doctrine. And it has nothing to do with the decision-makers, with the start of the war (Operation Al-Aqsa Storm) Israel’s deterrence doctrine exploded and collapsed in front of our faces, such a structural failure cannot be corrected instantly and in a short-term process.

This analyst stressed, throughout history, many structures have collapsed due to lack of proper preparation to face enemy attacks and mistakes in insisting on old doctrines, therefore we must Now let’s accept the agreement so that all the abductees return, then we will gather, assess our losses and then rebuild the army based on the lessons we learned from this war.

end of message /