Hebrew media: The war in Gaza created a big divide in Israel

according to the Hebrew group Tasnim news agency, Israel’s Zeman newspaper in a note examining the bad internal situation of the regime Zionism and the strong factions and divisions that govern this society, this regime paid after the Al-Aqsa storm operation.

Betsalil Levi has mentioned in his note in this media. Some well-wishers should ask themselves, if there is no news of unity in the society now, when should this unity exist? The answer to this question is quite simple from a historical point of view, Israel has not seen true unity at all, but a mixture of conflicting opinions with each other, but common actions and goals have caused this alignment.

In the modern era, we have been in almost similar situations only twice, when Israel was founded and in the Six Day War, and in both of them the future of Israel was at stake.

It is stated in another part of this note, if on the surface the desire for unity and cohesion was clearly seen, but under the surface the old ideological and political gaps are an unbridgeable obstacle. .

In the meantime, during the long years he was in power, Benjamin Netanyahu deliberately deepened these divisions in the Israeli society so that he could to continue his political life.

To realize his personal interests, Netanyahu tried to form a coalition with his political rivals such as Ehud Barak and Yair Lapid, but These coalitions did not last long.

In another part of this note, Benny Gantz can be a unique example of unity cabinets in Israel. Formed from the coalition of former chiefs of the army staff, it can attract the society and give them hope that these people can heal the relationship between the security and civilian scene…

But Benny Gantz and his friend Gadi Eisenkot, who was once called the 21st Chief of Staff of the Army, made a mistake in joining Netanyahu’s extraordinary cabinet, not because they had to join the extraordinary cabinet. war, but they should not have entered the cabinet that Netanyahu is the head of. It is also considered a big political risk for them because it can put them under accusations and bear the responsibility of turning their backs on war activities and providing for its capture by the extreme right.

A thing that, according to this writer, could lead to the end of Gantz’s political life, just as before him such mistakes led to the departure of Shaul Mofaz from the political scene.

end of message/