Hezbollah’s diplomatic tact in the face of the American and French plan

According to the international group Tasnim news agency, the Zionist regime of the front’s diplomatic process He left the North to his allies so that they could force the Lebanese resistance to give up the “unification of the fields” strategy through threats and bribery. Against Lebanon’s resistance, with an approach derived from political experience, it deals ambiguously with the plans presented by Amos Heckstein, Joe Biden’s senior adviser, and Stephane Sejournay, the French foreign minister, to stop the conflict.

The Lebanese resistance has tried to continue the attacks on the Zionist regime without explicitly opposing or agreeing to these plans, and at the same time it has maintained the channel of indirect negotiations with America and directly with France. In the meantime, Nabih Berri, Speaker of the Lebanese Parliament, who is considered an experienced politician, played a key role in the negotiations with the Western parties and was able to guide these negotiations well and prevent the closing of political horizons.

There is a border between Beirut and Tel Aviv, which was raised during the second trip to Beirut.

However, the subtlety and complexity of this process is that Hezbollah did not allow the Zionists to imagine the northern front. be relieved to fight the Palestinian resistance with an open hand and more force on the Gaza front and at the same time keep this door open.

Paris and Washington’s joint plan to split the resistance axis

On the other hand, the United States has emphasized to put more pressure on Lebanon that any help to the government and the army of this country depends on the active presence of the army forces on the southern (occupied Palestine) and eastern (Syria) borders and the activation of the watch towers on the borders It is under the control of the army.

The United States and the Zionist regime have been trying since the 90s to put the Lebanese army in line with Hezbollah, but this game was played at that time with the vigilance of Emil Lahoud. “, the commander of the army at the time, failed. After that, this did not happen at different times, but this time, the Americans and the French, considering Lebanon’s economic problems, emphasize that they are willing to provide financial aid only if the army acts as a buffer between the resistance and the forces. Fortunately, there is a consensus in Beirut regarding the role and importance of the resistance as the protector of the territorial integrity of Lebanon and the need to support Gaza. In the same context, “Mohammed Al-Khawaja”, a member of the Lebanese Parliament, told the Tasnim reporter in Beirut: “There is no discussion about establishing a ceasefire in southern Lebanon, before establishing a ceasefire in the besieged Gaza Strip.” This is an issue that has been emphasized by both the speaker of the parliament and the president, as well as the resistance.”

.

However, the game The political efforts of the United States and France to support the Zionist regime continue, and Hezbollah is also trying to react to this situation with tact and act in such a way that the interests of Lebanon are not harmed. In the meantime, the importance of the active presence of the resistance in the diplomatic arena is inevitable, and Hezbollah, understanding this issue, has tried to play a serious role in this process, imperceptibly.

end of message/