Israel’s attack on Lebanon; Propaganda or reality?

According to the international group Tasnim News Agency, the Zionist and Western media during In recent days, on the eve of the meeting of the security cabinet of this regime, they have started creating a wide atmosphere regarding this regime’s attack on Lebanon. The internal importance of this lies in the fact that after the resignation of Benny Gantz and Gadi Eysenkot from the War Cabinet, the Security Cabinet with the presence of Itmar Ben Goyer and Betsalel Smotrich, respectively the Ministries of Internal Security and Finance of the Netanyahu Cabinet, finds a decisive role in making strategic decisions. This cabinet is going to hold a meeting tomorrow regarding the latest developments in the northern borders of the occupied territories.

In the meantime, the Zionist media and officials emphasize the necessity of an imminent attack by exaggerating their plans. This is the only way to return security to the northern areas of the occupied territories. Referring to the unanimity of the decision-makers regarding the necessity of the attack (removing Gantz and Eysenkot), the Zionists state that Yoav Gallant’s recent position against the French mediation in the Lebanon case is also in the same direction.

In addition to this Claiming that as a result of the attacks of the last eight months, the Zionists have succeeded in destroying a significant part of Hamas’s military strength, they emphasize that the reduction of pressure on the southern front is an opportunity to attack the north.

Also. Some others, pointing out that Benjamin Netanyahu is looking for the continuation of the war, insist that the occurrence of a limited battle in southern Lebanon could be the reason for the continuation of the special status until the American presidential elections and the possible change of government in the White House in favor of Donald Trump, which is what Netanyahu wanted. , provide.

Despite the above three reasons, some other experts point out that the Zionist generals have been chanting against Hezbollah since October 8, and emphasize that Israel is not interested in an all-out war. Start with Hezbollah.

First of all, the Zionists are aware that Hezbollah’s weaponry is different from Hamas and Islamic Jihad, and that the Lebanese resistance, apart from attacks on barracks, has the ability to destroy infrastructure. It owns power plants, ports, airports and gas facilities of the regime. The cost of such a war is unbearable for the Zionist regime, which has been economically depleted for the last eight months, and it is a kind of unfortunate scenario for them.

Secondly, the army of the regime is free from propaganda. Conventional media is completely worn out and has not even been able to release the Israeli hostages and in the last operation to free 4 captives, 3 captives, sent a commando to death and in addition, more than 200 Palestinian civilians were also killed. testified.

Thirdly, in the international arena, the Zionist regime has not been able to get the approval of America for such an attack. While the Biden administration has managed to show the beginning of a ceasefire after months of consultation, the occurrence of such a conflict whose horizons are unknown disrupts the plans of the White House. Also, France, which traditionally considers Lebanon as its backyard, is not interested in this country getting into a war; Especially, politically, he is trying to unite the Christian forces to elect the new president of Lebanon, and he recently sent Le Drian to Beirut. The support of the Islamic Republic of Iran to Lebanon’s Hezbollah is another external factor that the Zionist regime will definitely consider in its calculations in its scenarios for attacking Lebanon.

At least on paper and based on the logic of profit and loss, the possibility of the Zionist regime not attacking Lebanon is more logical than a costly attack. However, experience has shown that the Zionist authorities are far from logic and rationality, and one should be prepared for any scenario in front of this regime.